If ever a threat or crisis looms over Singapore, the foremost thing on my mind would be the defense of my family. My family is my life, the people who made me who I am and an inseparable part of my life. Without them would be akin to ripping your heart in two.
I would agree that many people would be quick to criticize my views, slamming me for choosing my family over my country, asking where is my sense of patriotism and generally having the impression that I am a selfish coward.
These people are right in a sense. At the surface it does indeed seem like I am selfish, preferring to whisk my family to safety first. But if one looks a bit deeper and has the comprehension to understand the principle behind my actions, they too would agree with me.
Like Confucius said many centuries ago, happy and peaceful families are the strong foundations that hold up great nations and civilizations. The force that decides whether a nation is glorious or falls into ruin is the family. If families are unhappy, discontent and do not trust their own leaders, how can you expect the nation to survive in peacetime, let alone war? There would be rebellions, coups and uprisings all over the nation. Of course the government could try suppressing all these, but how long can they do it? Don't forget, the soldiers in the armies also have families of their own. How long before their families convince or force them to help overthrow the government? In the end one has to agree that history has and will continue to prove that families are an integral part of society.
Three aspects of society I believe are worth fighting and dying to protect and defend.
Family: The building blocks of society and the people closest to you.
Friends: The people you share common interests with, grow up with or stand alongside in times of crisis.
Freedom: All humans are free to make their own choices and suppressing that is a blatant violation of the laws of nature.
Commenting on Chiow Yan Hui (8):
I agree with Yan Hui on the majority of his views but I have to digress once he touches on the issue of defending his country.
Perhaps one might think that country is the most important thing we should strive to defend.
But what about the spirit of the people? Even if you keep the nation, which is simply a piece of land, but lose the spirit of the people, who become depressed, unhappy and lose the will to recover, how can one expect the country to pick itself up?
Although what if you keep the spirit of the people? Like the old saying, "keep the flame alive", if the flames of determination are kept alive, the people would eventually prevail and ultimately reclaim their nation and pride back. What do I mean?
Look at France for example. When France surrendered to Nazi Germany , many of it's people were actually unhappy! They wanted to continue the fight and drive the invaders away. Notable among the growing resistance movement was no doubt Charles DeGaulle, a young French officer, who formed a Free French Army composed of French volunteers who were determined to reclaim their homeland. Here was a perfect example of the spirit of the people in action.
Also worthy of mention is the mujahideen, Islamic guerillas who eventually drove the technologically superior Russians out of Afghanistan. They too are good examples of the spirit of the people in full swing.
Of course if one can hold on to both country and spirit, that would be great. Although if one day the decision came to whether sacrifice all the nation's sons and daughters to keep the nation or lose the country but spare the bloodshed and keep the spirit alive, I would have to advise all who read this to think it through before they make too hasty a decision.
Perhaps after you read this you will think differently about this issue. Like General Douglas MacArthur famously declared during World War 2 when he had to abandon his men in the Philippines to the advancing Japanese, "Keep the flag flying, I shall return".